Monthly Archives: January 2004

Maj. Michael Mori: Bravery Under Very Hostile Conditions

Law from the Center is UCLA law student blog, by a serving Army Captain. It has a very nice post about the amazing gumption shown by USMC Maj. Michael Mori in giving a press conference attacking the procedures being proposed for the Guantanamo Kangaroo courts hearings. (Lest you think that this Kangaroo court reference is unfair, I'll point you to the remark by Lord Steyn, and to Maj. Mori's claim that the tribunal is “created and controlled by those with a vested interest only in convictions” and that “Using the commission process just creates an unfair system that threatens to convict the innocent and provides the guilty a justifiable complaint as to their convictions.”)

I not only agree with everything in the “Law from the Center” post, I'll go one better (otherwise it wouldn't look so centrist, would it?). As I understand it, in the ordinary military law case, the lawyers who represent the defendant are kept in a different chain of command from the judges. This ensures their independence. I am reliably informed that several months ago, at least, the design for the tribunals did not include this independence, but that rather because everyone there is assigned to the Guantanamo base, the defense lawyers were to serve in the same chain of command as— ie effectively subordinate to—some or all of the officers acting as judges.

I don't know if this has changed since my correspondent observed this first-hand. If it hasn't, it's one of those serious structural problems that never gets the attention it deserves.

Meanwhile, I'd love a link to Maj. Mori's brief…

Posted in Guantanamo | 5 Comments

George W. Bush, Economist

Dan sent me this shining example of what you learn at the Harvard Business School:


Remarks by the President to the Press Pool


Nothin’ Fancy Cafe
Roswell, New Mexico

11:25 A.M. MST

THE PRESIDENT: I need some ribs.

Q Mr. President, how are you?

THE PRESIDENT: I’m hungry and I’m going to order some ribs.

Q What would you like?

THE PRESIDENT: Whatever you think I’d like.

Q Sir, on homeland security, critics would say you simply
haven’t spent enough to keep the country secure.

Continue reading

Posted in Completely Different | Comments Off on George W. Bush, Economist

Senate Republicans==Dishonorable People, Possibly Thieves

Senate courtliness and comity? Bipartisanship? Nah. Try dirty tricks, dishonor and thieving. And don't think for one minute that some Senators didn't know what was going on. If only Senate Democrats had the guts to take scalps.

Infiltration of files seen as extensive. Republican staff members of the US Senate Judiciary Committee infiltrated opposition computer files for a year, monitoring secret strategy memos and periodically passing on copies to the media, Senate officials told The Globe.

From the spring of 2002 until at least April 2003, members of the GOP committee staff exploited a computer glitch that allowed them to access restricted Democratic communications without a password. Trolling through hundreds of memos, they were able to read talking points and accounts of private meetings discussing which judicial nominees Democrats would fight — and with what tactics.

The office of Senate Sergeant-at-Arms William Pickle has already launched an investigation into how excerpts from 15 Democratic memos showed up in the pages of the conservative-leaning newspapers and were posted to a website last November.

With the help of forensic computer experts from General Dynamics and the US Secret Service, his office has interviewed about 120 people to date and seized more than half a dozen computers — including four Judiciary servers, one server from the office of Senate majority leader Bill Frist of Tennessee, and several desktop hard drives.

Don't let anyone tell you this is business as usual. Hacking into federal computers is usually a serious crime. Here, however, the criminal law issue is slightly murky.

Whether the memos are ultimately deemed to be official business will be a central issue in any criminal case that could result. Unauthorized access of such material could be punishable by up to a year in prison — or, at the least, sanction under a Senate non-disclosure rule.

The computer glitch dates to 2001, when Democrats took control of the Senate after the defection from the GOP of Senator Jim Jeffords, Independent of Vermont.

A technician hired by the new judiciary chairman, Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, apparently made a mistake that allowed anyone to access newly created accounts on a Judiciary Committee server shared by both parties — even though the accounts were supposed to restrict access only to those with the right password.

Posted in Law: Criminal Law, Politics: US | Comments Off on Senate Republicans==Dishonorable People, Possibly Thieves

Hard Labor or Nice Work, It’s Still Overtime

The nice people from Voyeur Dorm are in the news again. Last time the question was whether a virtual business ran afoul of a local zoning ordinance prohibiting adult businesses providing entertainment 'to the public' (the 11th Circuit said it was not, since the public was not allowed to attend in person). This time twelve former Voyeur Dorm employees are suing the site's owner,

alleging that the daily regimen of semi-nude sunbathing, housekeeping, swimming, showering and chat-room correspondence in the fishbowl of the World Wide Web went well beyond the limited hours they were told they would have to work.

They seek compensation for uncollected overtime pay.

The Tampa company has fired back with a lawsuit of its own, alleging two of the women violated a ''noncompete'' agreement by taking their talents, training and trade secrets to a rival business called Voyeur Cam Friends.

Although cavorting in a dorm may sound like easy labor, the plaintiffs say nitpicky rules often stipulated how they slept (with one leg dangling outside the sheets), brushed their teeth or watched TV (topless, or while painting one's toenails).

Continue reading

Posted in Law: Internet Law | Comments Off on Hard Labor or Nice Work, It’s Still Overtime

The Growing National Security State In the News

It's just amazing how much of the important domestic news these days is either about economic troubles (defict, declining dollar, jobless recovery) or about conflicts over the role of the national security apparatus. Here's today's first haul of the national security related news:

  • Military Lawyer Blasts Tribunal Rules—more very justified complaining about the rules of engagement before the military tribunal at Guantanamo
  • Easing of Internet Regulations Challenges Surveillance Efforts: the spooks are at it again. Their campaign to retain their total access to all of our communications is in danger of being frustrated by…cable modems. So they're pulling out all the stops to make them as transparent to FBI (and NSA?) intercepts as ordinary telephones.
  • Meanwhile, Congress has a small case of heartburn over the renewal of certain sections of the Patriot Act. The fix to renew may be in, but Lawmakers Not Rushing to Take Up Terrorism Act…certainly not going to happen until safely after the election. Who knows, it's so unpopular that there might even be hearings to discuss the effects of the statute before Congress votes on it….
  • And, Ex-C.I.A. Aides Ask Inquiry by Congress Over Leak of Name. That darn Palme case just won't go away, and the CIA won't let go of the issue. Now they are pressuring Congress in order to create pressure on the Justice department. (While I completely agree with the CIA view here, and think this is the sort of issue they have a right to go to Congress about, I always get nervous when the secret services get involved in politics….)

And a bonus item: things are not so great in Canada either.

At least it's still newsworthy (and legal to publish).

Posted in Politics: US | Comments Off on The Growing National Security State In the News

What I Do To Procrastinate: Tweak Code

For various reasons it doesn't seem worth updating to the new versions of MT that have been released recently. The stuff I've read suggests that the changes are either unnecessary for folks like me who have installed agressive (very agressive) comment spam filtering, or downright trouble. So I think I'll wait for version 3.0 before doing anything major like that.

So, instead, I've been toying around with some of the templates for the blog. I added a link to the RSS 2.0 feed and some new silly statistics. I did some cleaning up here and there. Soon I'll maybe change the way that links are displayed, perhaps highlight the background when moused over.

It would be good programming practice to have a test blog somewhere to do all this to rather than doing the experimenting on a live site. I do know that. But I'm ignoring it. So if anything seems weird in the next day or so, give it five minutes and see if it goes away. If it doesn't, please drop me a note. And, of course, if you have suggestions for the blog—layout, content, whatever, feel free to comment on this entry, or write me privately.

Continue reading

Posted in Discourse.net | Comments Off on What I Do To Procrastinate: Tweak Code