Monthly Archives: April 2005

Meetup Moves to Pay-to-Play Model

Meetup isn't free any longer. The interesting question is how many organizers of meetings will be willing to pay (or at least front, pending contributions from members) $20/month, or even $10/month to keep using the service.

We have here an exciting empirical test of the dollar denominated size of the barriers to group formation so eloquently explored by Mancur Olson in The Logic of Collective Action.

I predict the demise of my local Slashdot meetup — which I've never attended and which from the look of it I'd guess has fewer than six attendees most months.

Changes – Meetup.com: I'm proud to announce that thousands of Meetups are growing and becoming a vital community resource. In fact, the number of Meetups is up 50% this year so far! We couldn't be more excited about the potential for more great Meetups, including yours.

Everyone asks “How does Meetup.com pay its bills?” That question is even more important as we plan new ways for you to grow your group and have better Meetups. To get there together, we are introducing a required small monthly Group Fee to be paid by Organizers.

Do all members pay? No. Organizers pay the Group Fee to Meetup.com and may ask their members to chip in. It's up to the Organizers. The fee is per group, not per person.

How much & when? The regular Group Fee is $19/month, but Organizers of current groups get a special 2005 rate of $9/month if they pay now.

Why a fee? Because we want to be most focused on the people. Nobody else. As Bob Dylan said, you “gotta serve somebody.” Well, if we gotta serve somebody, we prefer it to be you. We're here to help you succeed at growing great Meetups and trust you to understand that 'there's no such thing as a free lunch.' This is all we do, so our success is tied to your success. We intend to earn this fee.

Any new benefits? Yes. All members of groups get 1-to-1 email! Plus, we'll ship (mail, not email) materials to Organizers, customized for your group, to help you attract more members. Also, groups get new tools to pool their money to make better Meetups.

Posted in Internet | 2 Comments

Body Slam

Reading Michael Bérubé this week reminds me of the old French proverb: Cet animal est tres mechant. Quand on l’attaque, il se defend (“This animal is very naughty. When you attack it, it defends itself.”).

Posted in Blogs | 2 Comments

Needlenose Rediscovers Sinclair Lewis

Needlenose It Can't Happen Here.

Posted in Readings | Comments Off on Needlenose Rediscovers Sinclair Lewis

My Colleagues Have Been Busy

The colleagues have been writing books recently, and this evening the Dean is throwing them a (very) small party to celebrate. Here are the descriptions sent out with the invite.

  • Kenneth Casebeer, Work Law in American Society (Carolina Academic Press 2005). Written in the traditions of legal realism, law and society, and materials analysis, this casebook focuses on both individual and collective law and legal power in our society. Organized around the legal contests facing people who work within a democratically established market economy, it deals with contemporary conflicts within finance-driven and internationalized divisions of social labor in increasingly multi-cultural workforces. It is meant to facilitate student speculation on the many relationships of legal practices within, and to, democracy.
  • D. Marvin Jones, Race, Sex Suspicion: The Myth of the Black Male (Praeger 2005). This book explores the basic conflict between the legal equality that black men possess as U.S. citizens and their social isolation stemming from white America’s perceptions of them as “culturally alien.” It challenges the negative images and stereotypes that indicate a fundamental defect in the mainframe of American culture.
  • Martha Mahoney (with John O. Calmore and Stephanie Wildman), Social Justice: Professionals, Communities and Law, Cases and Materials (West 2003). This casebook provides materials enabling the study of law and lawyering for social justice. It will help students gain a richer view of the profession than they gain in most law school courses, and stimulate them to think broadly about the role of lawyers in working with contemporary movements for social change. Also reviews the strategies and activities of social justice lawyers in collaboration with community activists. These issues are explored systematically, allowing emphasis on different themes and substantive areas depending on the interests and focus of a particular course.
  • William Twining (with Iain Hamphsher-Monk (Editors)), Evidence and Inference in History and Law: Interdisciplinary Dialogues (Northwestern 2003). The contributors to this book advance our understanding of how truth-seeking, proof-finding methods work, and of what it means to prove something in a range of contexts. The book reveals how particular concepts, lines of questioning, and techniques of reasoning and analysis developed in one context can be fruitfully applied in others. Among the questions that bring the contributors together: Was Edith Thompson, famously convicted in 1923 of murdering her husband, a victim of a serious miscarriage of justice? Did cuneiform languages really die out in the second or third century B.C.? Was Franz Schubert responsible for any of the guitar arrangements for some of his lieder?
  • Bruce Winick:
    • Bruce Winick, Civil Commitment: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Model (Carolina Academic Press 2005). Through an understanding of the civil commitment of people with mental illness, this book offers a new model of commitment which strikes an appropriate balance between the protection of legal rights and the achievement of clinical needs. The model uses therapeutic jurisprudence to examine a variety of issues relating to civil commitment and proposes how legal practices may be restructured to increase the efficacy of hospitalization. It analyzes the key issues in civil commitment and makes concrete proposals concerning how commitment laws and their application can be restructured to bring about better therapeutic outcomes.
    • Bruce J. Winick (with John Q. Lafond and John Q. LA Fond (Editors)), Protecting Society from Sexually Dangerous Offenders: Law, Justice, and Therapy (American Psychological Association 2003). This book analyzes controversial new legal strategies adopted over the past decades. It examines innovative measures, including sexual predator laws used to commit dangerous sex offenders to mental hospitals after they serve their sentences, registration laws, and programs.
    • Bruce J. Winick (with David B. Wexler), Judging in a Therapeutic Key: Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Courts (Carolina Academic Press 2003). This book describes the newly emerging problem-solving courts (such as drug treatment courts, domestic violence courts, mental health courts, etc.) and other related approaches to problem-solving judging and judging with an explicit ethic of care. It also covers emerging “principles” of therapeutic jurisprudence that seem to be at work in successful judicial approaches: how courts can encourage offender reform, how they can help offenders develop problem-solving and coping skills, how they can encourage offender compliance with release conditions, how they can serve as effective risk managers, and much more.
Posted in U.Miami | Comments Off on My Colleagues Have Been Busy

As Granfalloons Go, It’s a Good One

Here's today's quiz question. It's a doozy.

What do the following people and organizations have in common?

Hint: The above is the full list of persons and entities that have this particular thing in common.

Answer below.

Continue reading

Posted in Law: Free Speech | 1 Comment

RNC Arrests Supported With Doctored Evidence

After the police smothering of anti-trade-liberalization protests in Miami, and of the anti-GOP protests in New York, it's harder than it used to be to assert that we have a meaningful right to assemble and protest in this country.

Stories like this don't help:

Videos Challenge Accounts of Convention Unrest: For Mr. Kyne and 400 others arrested that week, video recordings provided evidence that they had not committed a crime or that the charges against them could not be proved, according to defense lawyers and prosecutors.

Among them was Alexander Dunlop, who said he was arrested while going to pick up sushi.

Last week, he discovered that there were two versions of the same police tape: the one that was to be used as evidence in his trial had been edited at two spots, removing images that showed Mr. Dunlop behaving peacefully. When a volunteer film archivist found a more complete version of the tape and gave it to Mr. Dunlop's lawyer, prosecutors immediately dropped the charges and said that a technician had cut the material by mistake.

How convenient.

Posted in Civil Liberties | 2 Comments