The first coverage of the Privacy Committee meeting is out:
- Dara Kam, Panel urges state Supreme Court to decide on Web records
- Anthony Colarossi, Panel advises putting court records online
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Comments
- Brooks Fudenberg on I Voted
- Jermaine Chad Ingram on Some Thoughts about the Downballot (Voters’ Guide Part II: Judicial Retention Elections)
- C.E. Petit on I Voted
- Jane Moscowitz on I Voted
- Ally Figueroa on Some Thoughts about the Downballot (Voters’ Guide Part II: Judicial Retention Elections)
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 52 other subscribers
yes, this isn’t the right thread.
but,
no reaction to the supreme court’s opinion that private property can be seized for private development,
(basically) as long as any case can be made that it will benefit the public?
i think this is one of the most important cases i’ve seen in a long time.