Monthly Archives: January 2006

Berkely J Students Are So Lucky

Berkeley J-School students are in for a treat: Brad DeLong is going to explain to them how not to get snowed by politicians spouting economic statistics See Covering the Economy for a taste of what he’s up to.

Just a few basic rules — understanding trends, comparing like with like, doing everything in real dollars would be a good start.

And, Brad, I know you are mainly intersted in public data from federal sources, but may I mention one of my pet peeves? I hatehatehate the way the business section reports corporate profits. Neither I nor anyone else cares if profits were up or down twelve million percent over last year. That depends so much on what last year was like. We want to know how much it grew in real dollars, or maybe the ROI compared to last year, to other players in the industry, or the industry as a whole. Or anything else standardized and meaningful. BUT NOT % CHANGE OVER LAST YEAR. (Please?)

Posted in Econ & Money | 5 Comments

Meetings Considererd Harmful

Meetings considered harmful. But we knew that.

It does, however, allow me to include a shot of one of my all-time favorite Demotivators:

Posted in Science/Medicine | Comments Off on Meetings Considererd Harmful

Herding Cats

Here’s inspiration for every law school Dean: It can be done.

Posted in Completely Different | 2 Comments

Vladeck on Padilla

My youngest colleague, UM Law Prof Steve Vladeck, has another fine JURIST column, this time on the AUMF and the Ever-Increasing Importance of Padilla.

Posted in Civil Liberties, Padilla | Comments Off on Vladeck on Padilla

Taming the Blog Comment Flamers

Today’s coincidence: I deleted a comment today (a very rare event around here) due to its knuckle-dragging racism. A few minutes later, via Captology Notebook, I ran into Have a hug. It seems that by pre-loading the phrase “Everyone needs a hug” into the comment box of a blog, the owner cut down flames “by a huge amount”.

It’s so cutesy that I can’t quite bring myself to try it. Yet.

Posted in Internet | 3 Comments

Market Manipulation in Discourse.net Shares? (Translation please)

It’s probably been almost two years since I last looked at discourse.net’s listing at blogshares. Shortly after registering there I decided this wasn’t a game I was going to play, and more or less forgot about it without doing any transactions.

On a whim I looked at blogshare’s discourse.net listing over the weekend, and found lots of strange stuff.

Can anyone please explain the meaning of multiple “press releases” by people I don’t know that sound like the following,

Discourse.net suffered a huge setback with several analysts urging their clients to ditch the stock as it suffered a public relations disaster. The exact nature of customer dissatisfaction was not known but sara bear was rumoured to have had a hand in it. Industry insiders suspect a Star Spangled Banner (artefact) was involved. Discourse.net share price dropped from B$56,734.68 to B$32,906.11

sara bear declined to comment on the recent speculation.

“Huge setback”? “(artefact)”? “customer dissatisfaction”? And, how did one Matt Williams come to have what seems to be a controlling interest of 71.2%? Did I sell shares without noticing?

Not that I suppose it actually matters…

Posted in Discourse.net | 1 Comment