Monthly Archives: January 2007

Is that a Loonie in Your Pocket or is Someone Else Glad to See Me?

Canadian coins bugged, U.S. security agency says: They say money talks, and a new report suggests Canadian currency is indeed chatting, at least electronically, on behalf of shadowy spies.

Canadian coins containing tiny transmitters have mysteriously turned up in the pockets of at least three American contractors who visited Canada, says a branch of the U.S. Department of Defence. …

“On at least three separate occasions between October 2005 and January 2006, cleared defence contractors’ employees travelling through Canada have discovered radio frequency transmitters embedded in Canadian coins placed on their persons,” the report says. …

Bugging a coin with an RFID is a weird way to track people since they are likely to spend the coins.

Could this be a mad scientist economist doing a study on the velocity of money? Where’s George on Canadian steroids?

Posted in Law: Privacy, National Security | 3 Comments

Congratulations to FIU and Barry Law Schools

Word has just reached me (code for: I started reading the stuff piled in my “in” box) that FIU and Barry law schools both achieved full ABA accreditation in December.

Congratulations to all. The FIU achievement is particularly impressive, as they did it in the minimum time possible under the rules.

Posted in Miami | Comments Off on Congratulations to FIU and Barry Law Schools

A Different Iraq Metric

Cosmic Iguana – Voice of the Evil Doers says,

US SPENT $1 MIL FOR EVERY DEAD IRAQI – CIVILIANS INCLUDED:
GUARDIAN:

Early this year the Bush administration is to ask Congress to approve an additional $100bn for the onerous task of making life intolerable for the Iraqis. This will bring the total spent on the White House’s current obsession with war to almost $500bn – enough to have given every US citizen $1,600 each… with over half a million dead, it means that the world’s greatest military superpower has spent a million dollars for every Iraqi killed… [*]

Last year I posted that the US had shot 250,000 bullets per dead insurgent [*]. I suggested sarcastically that our kill ratio was not that bad when you consider how many civilians we have knocked off. Now it appears that even taking that into account we’re not dreadfully efficient.

But I especially liked this:

One commenter suggested it would be cheaper to kill people by dropping the bundles of money we’re spending directly on their heads.

Posted in Iraq | Comments Off on A Different Iraq Metric

Beyond Parody (Hall of Mirrors Dept)

In the course of recounting some media stupidity so dumb I don't even want to write about it, The Carpetbagger Report asks,

I can’t help but notice that Stephen Colbert’s over-the-top parodies of right-wing blowhards is looking less and less like a parody all the time. As Kevin Drum put it, “Parody is going to become a lost art if the blowhard brigade keeps trying to top itself with stuff like this. I mean, what could I possibly write that was any more ridiculous than the thing itself?”

I think I've got the answer: O'Reilly, Colbert to trade appearances.

Posted in The Media | Comments Off on Beyond Parody (Hall of Mirrors Dept)

Historians Make News!

Riveting Highlights from the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Historical Association.

On Thursday, just after noon, the Tufts historian Felipe Fernandez-Armesto was arrested by Atlanta police as he crossed the middle of the street between the Hilton and Hyatt hotels. After being thrown on the ground and handcuffed, the former Oxford don was formally arrested, his hands cuffed behind his back. Several policemen pressed hard on his neck and chest, leaving the mild-mannered scholar, who’s never gotten so much as a parking ticket, bruised and in pain. He was then taken to the city detention center along with other accused felons and thrown into a filthy jail cell filled with prisoners. He remained incarcerated for eight hours. Officials demanded bail of over a thousand dollars. To come up up with the money Fernandez-Armesto, the author of nineteen books, had to make an arrangement with a bail bondsman. In court even the prosecutors seemed embarrassed by the incident, which got out of hand when Fernandez-Armesto requested to see the policeman’s identification (the policeman was wearing a bomber jacket; to Fernandez-Armesto, a foreigner unfamiliar with American culture, the officer did not look like an officer). The prosecutors asked the professor to plead nolo contendere. He refused, concerned that the stain on his record might put his green card status in jeopardy. Officials finally agreed to drop all charges. The judge expressed his approval. The professor says he has no plans to sue. But the AHA council is considering lodging a complaint with the city.

The interview with Prof. Fernandez-Armesto is at once hysterically funny and a cringe-making embarrassment to Atlanta,


Click here for Part 2. Click here for Part 3.

Oh yes–the AHA made some history at this meeting too:

At the annual Business Meeting, a proceeding usually featuring dry reports by the organization’s leaders, the members approved an anti-war resolution, the first in the AHA’s existence. The voice vote at the packed meeting was nearly unanimous. It was sponsored by Historians Against the War.

Posted in Iraq, Law: Criminal Law | 2 Comments

Dealing With E-Mailed Research Queries from Strangers

Almost every day I get an email from a student somewhere that reads something vaguely like this one I received today:

Dear Mr. Froomkin.

As a graduate student in The [Redacted] Institute for the History and Philosophy of Sciences and Ideas at [Redacted] university, [OECD country] I am doing a reaearch on building an identity and self representation in the blogs. I read some of your papers refering to Habermas, which might be of use to me. Would you be able to send me some more papers [or adresses of these] talking about Habermas attitude towards the discourse used by individuals while trying to represent themselves, wheather in a true or false way, using blogs or psychological forums on the internet.

Any other citations dealing with Habermas, Discourse and the cyber would be of help.

Thanks

Perhaps because I’m an intellectual dilettante, the subject matter of the queries vary widely. Other variations on the theme involve questions from students in far less developed countries (who may not have access to as many materials), and questions from high school students — or even grade school — students doing a class project who want to know my views on some loaded question, like whether all speech or only harmful speech should be regulated online. And then (especially in December, January, April and May) there are the US college and UK law students who have an urgent question about some point of cyberlaw which they really need answered before 3pm today — presumably because it’s a question on their open book exam.

I try to respond to the grade school and high school queries whenever I can. And I try to be helpful with the third-world correspondents because I want to be sensitive to the possibility that they don’t have a good library to hand, and that their internet access may be slow or limited. And if I happen to have written a paper on the subject of the query, I send the URL — although I wonder why anyone who could find my email address couldn’t also find my papers. And if the student has an interesting topic, once in a while I offer to read the paper when it is in draft.

But for the bulk of the more advanced students in the developed world who ought to be doing their own research — well, there the struggle is to be polite. Or at least not too rude.

Today was not a good day: I’m afraid I responded as follows,

I haven’t written other papers in this area.

You may find the following links helpful:

http://www.google.com

http://scholar.google.com/

But I’m torn: on the one hand, scholarly inquiry is a good thing. And I might have known the answer off the top of my head, in which case I would have given it. And just because today’s questioner comes after dozens, maybe hundreds, of others, doesn’t mean he really deserves my bad temper. On the other hand, I’m not his research assistant, and life is short.

But of course, I already feel guilty: Was I too curt? I’d be very curious to hear from other people on both sides of these sorts of exchanges what the right way to deal with them is.

Posted in Law School | 7 Comments