SCOTUS Blog has a very fine summary of the state of play of US law regarding detainees at Guantanamo and other offshore locations. Primer on detainees' status now — Part I and Primer on detainees' status now — Part II.
Recommended.
SCOTUS Blog has a very fine summary of the state of play of US law regarding detainees at Guantanamo and other offshore locations. Primer on detainees' status now — Part I and Primer on detainees' status now — Part II.
Recommended.
Democratic Presidential hopeful John Edwards is starting a new effort to “support the troops and end the war” and he's registered a very long domain name to organize it: supportthetroopsendthewar.com: Support the troops. End the war. Take action May 26th, 27th, 28th.
Take Action May 26th, 27th, 28th
As citizens, we honor and support our troops for their service and sacrifice.
As Americans, we are blessed by that sacrifice and support, which keeps us safe and keeps us strong.
As patriots, we call on our government to support our troops in the most important way it can – by ending this war and bringing them home.
This Memorial Day weekend, we will all take responsibility for the country we love and the men and women who protect it. We will volunteer, we will pray, and we will speak out. Each of us has a responsibility to act, a duty to our troops and to each other. Support the troops. End the war.
The site invites people to sign up for demonstrations and other activities in their neighborhoods.
I heard about this because for reasons never explained to me I was invited onto a very brief one-way conference call in which Edwards announced the initiative. He didn't talk long, but he said all the right things: that the movement to end the war was more important than a political campaign, that the point of the event was to support the troops by bringing them home.
My favorite two Edwards soundbites from the call:
“We're going to reclaim patriotism.”
…
“The best way to serve our troops is to end this war.”
Edwards also has a YouTube promo for the event.
Now I feel bad that I'm going to be at a conference in Bologna over Memorial Day weekend. So I won't be demonstrating in Miami. But I do agree that the time has come to be visible, and I'm going to have to find other ways to do that.
An English prof blogs about an unreasonable student request in “Most outrageous note evar.”
While I agree that this student's request is totally unreasonable (barring a medical emergency), I think this blogger's reaction shows that English profs lead sheltered lives. Here in law school, where we train people to be advocates, many students come to think they have nothing to lose by making pushy requests, even ridiculous ones, and they do it quite often. Given how things work, they may be right — there's not much penalty for being turned down and, as fund-raisers say, “If you don't ask, you don't get.” Figuring out where the line is between zealous advocacy and Rule 11 (sanctions for frivolous or vexatious arguments) takes judgment, and it takes some people longer to acquire that than others.
One tries not to get inured, but I suppose it creeps up….
Previous related post: If You Don't Ask, You Don't Get. But Some Things You Shouldn't Ask.
This sort of complete incompetence — or dissembling under oath — ought surely to be impeachable.
Think Progress » Gonzales: “I Haven't Really Thought About” Habeas Corpus:
At today’s House Judiciary Committee hearing, Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) asked Attorney General Alberto Gonzales whether any U.S. citizens are “being held today, for over a month, who have been denied habeas corpus or access to an attorney.” Instead of giving an answer, Gonzales replied, “[Y]ou’re asking me a question I hadn’t really thought about.”
Sherman then followed up and asked whether there any “U.S. citizens being held now by foreign governments or foreign organizations, without access to attorneys, as a result of rendition.” Gonzales again said, “It’s just — quite frankly, I hadn’t thought about this.”
Sandboxie describes itself like this:
When you run a program on your computer, data flows from the hard disk to the program via read operations. The data is then processed and displayed, and finally flows back from the progam to the hard disk via write operations.
For example, if you run the Freecell program to play a game, it starts by reading the previously recorded statistics, displaying and altering them as you play the game, and finally writing them back to disk for future reference.
Sandboxie changes the rules such that write operations do not make it back to your hard disk.
The illustration shows the key component of Sandboxie: a transient storage area, or sandbox. Data flows in both directions between programs and the sandbox. During read operations, data may flow from the hard disk into the sandbox. But data never flows back from the sandbox into the hard disk.
If you run Freecell inside the Sandboxie environment, Sandboxie reads the statistics data from the hard disk into the sandbox, to satisfy the read requested by Freecell. When the game later writes the statistics, Sandboxie intercepts this operation and directs the data to the sandbox.
If you then run Freecell without the aid of Sandboxie, the read operation would bypass the sandbox altogether, and the statistics would be retrieved from the hard disk.
The transient nature of the sandbox makes it is easy to get rid of everything in it. If you were to throw away the sandbox, by deleting everything in it, the sandboxed statistics would be gone for good, as if they had never been there in the first place.
Sandboxie and the Web
Protecting your Freecell statistics using Sandboxie may be a good idea when a less qualified player comes along, but you will probably want to play most of your games outside the sandbox. On the other hand, you may want to run your Web browser inside the sandbox most of the time. This way any incoming, unsolicited software (spyware, malware and the like) that you download, is trapped in the sandbox. Changes made to your list of Favorites or Bookmarks, hijacking of your preferred start page, new and unwanted icons on your desktop — all these, and more, are trapped in and bound to the sandbox.
You could also try a new toolbar add-on, browser extension or just about any kind of software. If you don't like it, you throw away the sandbox, and start again with a fresh sandbox. On the other hand, if you do like the new piece of software, you can re-install it outside the sandbox so it becomes a permanent part of your system.
Sandboxie intercepts changes to both your files and registry settings, making it virtually impossible for any software to reach outside the sandbox.
Sandboxie traps cached browser items into the sandbox as a by-product of normal operation, so when you throw away the sandbox, all the history records and other side-effects of your browsing disappear as well.
Which means, if I understand it right, that it would be safe to run IE with ActiveX turned on? It might even be safe to run Exchange???
I've added a Washington Post “widget” to the right margin that promotes my brother's column. I like the column; I don't like the widget very much — it blinks too much. But I'm going to try it for at least a few days before I decide if it's too distracting.
It's probably time to re-design the entire site, but I just don't have the time.