Monthly Archives: July 2007

On Bow Ties

PrawfsBlawg posts on Bow Ties, kindly lumping me among the “young men.” I'm now old enough to appreciate that.

The question which sparks the discussion is from an “anonymous female reader,”

I dare you to do a post on bow ties. I don't know much about male sartorial inclinations. But what's up with the young men and bow ties? Geoffrey Rapp, Michael Froomkin come to mind. I'm sure there's more. Is it for gravitas?

You should do a post about tie choice for all you fellows out there (for the ladies, Miranda Fleischer did one on hair down vs. ponytails and there have been many posts about wardrobe choices for classrooms on Prawfs). See if there's a two-tailed distribution for bow ties: the very young and the very old, or the shooting-for-gravitas and the shooting-for-gravestones.

In fact, the reasons for wearing bow ties are legion, and most have nothing to do with a quest for gravitas, quite the contrary:

  • Harder to get soup on it;
  • Socially sanctioned minor rebellion which exposes constriction of carotid artery custom as really silly;
  • Fits more easily in a pocket;
  • Stand out in a crowd — when meeting people for the first time can tell them, “look for the guy in the bow tie”;
  • If it's good enough for Justice Stevens, it's good enough for me.

(Suspenders, now, that's another story…)

Did I mention that back in the early days of the internet, I was, I believe, the first person to post online directions on how to tie a bow tie?

Previous bow-tie posting: What a strange question.

Posted in Kultcha | 3 Comments

Brad Wants You to Have Your Shots

An economist looks at stupid vaccination policies and throws up his hands in disgust:

A well-designed health care-financing system would dock providers whose patients failed to get all their vaccinations. If we had a well-designed health care-financing system, bureaucrats would be chasing us down the street with syringes full of vaccines, rather than rationing-by-hassle.

Posted in Science/Medicine | Comments Off on Brad Wants You to Have Your Shots

20 More Possible Reasons Not to Use Vista

There are a few reasons to use Vista and lots of reasons not to. Here are 20 more candidates for the second group from Softpedia:

Are you using Windows Vista? Then you might as well know that the licensed operating system installed on your machine is harvesting a healthy volume of information for Microsoft. In this context, a program such as the Windows Genuine Advantage is the last of your concerns. In fact, in excess of 20 Windows Vista features and services are hard at work collecting and transmitting your personal data to the Redmond company.

Microsoft makes no secret about the fact that Windows Vista is gathering information. End users have little to say, and no real choice in the matter.

The Redmond company emphasized numerous times the fact that all information collected is not used to identify or contact users.

I don't for a second doubt that Microsoft means this. But that's not the right question: the issue isn't how they use it; the issue is how they store it. If the data are collected and stored in a manner that retains a personally-identifiable character, then either Microsoft or someone who handed it a subpoena (or warrant) could use the data to link an IP number to whatever else is collected. And on this question the article is silent — which means that while this may or may not be worth worrying about, we can't actually tell for sure either from this story or from Microsoft's Vista Privacy Statement (indeed, from the sound of the latter, it does sound as if at least some of the data are kept individualized rather than aggregated). And until we know more, chalk up more reasons not to use Vista.

And here's the chaser:

Microsoft has an additional collection of 47 Windows Vista features and services that collect user data. However, not all phone home and report to Microsoft. Although the data collection process is generalized across the list, user information is also processed and kept on the local machine, leaving just approximately 50% of the items to both harvest data and contact Microsoft. Still, Microsoft underlined the fact that the list provided under the Windows Vista Privacy Statement is by no means exhaustive, nor does it apply to all the company's websites, services and products.

Posted in Software | 1 Comment

Where I’m Going

I'm going to have another little burst of travel: Saturday I'll be leaving for the Durham, NC area to drop off a camper (the two-legged, not the four-wheeled, sort), Monday I'll go on to Toronto to spend a packed work-week in a room with other members of the ICANN NomCom.

The NomCom's proceedings are covered by promises of confidentiality, so I won't be blogging about them — and if the meetings run late, which they likely will, I many not be blogging about much else next week either.

After that, it's back home for the rest of the summer.

PS. No substantive posts today because I spent the WHOLE DAY in a meeting (but not about ICANN).

Posted in Personal | 5 Comments

Will Libby Escape Probation Too? Maybe Not

Meanwhile, Judge Walton asks if Libby is even eligible for probation when his sentence was commuted before he served it (the statute assumes that supervised release follows incarceration). He's asked for briefs by Monday (Judge Walton's order and further discussion at Scotus Blog, Sentencing Law and Policy, Big Tent Democrat and Firedoglake).

The good folks at Talkleft, however, think they have two plausible answers to this: (1) the day Scooter got booked counts as one day of incarceration for time-served credit, so that satisfies the statutory pre-requisite; (2) the statute doesn't matter, because the commutation power is plenary, and the president can transmutate prison time into something less harsh (people can refuse pardons, so there is no risk that something harsher would be substituted). As a result, the statute prerequisite isn't relevant here. Details at Suggestions for Judge Walton on Libby's Supervised Release.

Posted in Politics: US: GW Bush Scandals | Comments Off on Will Libby Escape Probation Too? Maybe Not

Daily Kos: Libby’s “Pardon on the Installment Plan” == Sabotage of Investigation

Daily Kos: A Pardon on the Installment Plan

It should be noted, for future record, that the President of the United States has just used his power of clemency to sabotage an active criminal investigation into the office of his own Vice President. In some parallel universes, I have heard tell that such a thing was once itself considered corruption, or obstruction. It seems at minimum useful to put a footnote in the history books, somewhere, that such a remarkable thing could happen and still receive not merely praise, but unsheepish celebration among people who pretend nightly to be serious about such things.

I think almost everyone involved sees this as what it almost certainly is: Scooter Libby, loyal to the last, is getting his pardon on the installment plan. There is little advantage — and distinct disadvantage — for Bush to pardon the charges entirely, at the moment, but Bush indeed came through with an impeccably timed effort to ensure Libby faced no actual material consequences from his actions. Facing immediate jail time? Then kill the jail time. All of it, from day one onward. If Libby was in any actual danger of having to pay his $250,000 fine, there seems little doubt he would have seen that part of his sentence commuted as well.

But now Libby is in no imminent danger: problem solved. Bush has neatly and in one action removed any impetus for Libby — or anyone else — to cooperate with government investigators. There is no leverage a prosecutor can use against Libby, in order to gain a plea deal in exchange for information that he has so far refused to provide. Conservative backers have contributed more than five million dollars in a slush fund for Libby's defense, and are eager to help him in his hour of need.

Posted in Politics: US: GW Bush Scandals | Comments Off on Daily Kos: Libby’s “Pardon on the Installment Plan” == Sabotage of Investigation