He isn’t shy about it.
Direct link if embed doesn’t work.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Comments
- Brooks Fudenberg on I Voted
- Jermaine Chad Ingram on Some Thoughts about the Downballot (Voters’ Guide Part II: Judicial Retention Elections)
- C.E. Petit on I Voted
- Jane Moscowitz on I Voted
- Ally Figueroa on Some Thoughts about the Downballot (Voters’ Guide Part II: Judicial Retention Elections)
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 52 other subscribers
The topic of negative political attacks, and lots of what gets talked about on this blog, is poorly served in the short format that we use here. And I’ve trashed a lot of the negative ads that you’ve shared, largely because I think that they are unfair fearmongering and because I think that Trump provides ample fodder for more accurate/fair attacks. This ad that you’ve shared today is, in my mind, an example of fair and reasonable negative advertising. And I will be sharing it too.