Category Archives: 9/11 & Aftermath

London

The BBC reports thirty-seven deaths confirmed so far in today's London bombings.

Here's a piece of Glyn Maxwell's story, towards the beginning of The Sugar Mile, of the bombs falling on London sixty-odd years ago (and no, I'm not planning on making a habit of poetry in this blog):

Everyone's come to look at where we were.
There's nothing to see, though, is there, Julie. There,
there. I say it to you but you're not crying
    I'm the one.

You're the one not doing a single thing
but looking at your fingers, I'm the one.
Everyone's come to look at our old home
    when it's too late

for visits. Should have been there yesterday.
Given you lemonade we did have plenty.
Didn't think I'd cry, it's not as if I'm
    at the pictures,

it's just that I loved that house it's never sunk in.
It never has. Mrs. Piper, she was digging
yesterday and she said for Victory
    poor old Jule.

Look, there's Joey Stone. I knew he'd come.
Nothing's happened to him. I had this dream.
There's the silver balloons, are they just there
    to say hello?

Halloo, silver balloons. Can you lift us up
and put us down in a bluebell field of sheep
high in the mountains? We want to hitch a ride,
    me and my sis,

if that's your destination. What did you say?
What did you say there, Jule? The Crystal County?
You heard her. The Crystal County, silver balloons,
    at the double!

Posted in 9/11 & Aftermath | 1 Comment

False Alarm

Remember that rise to “orange alert” back in in the 2003 holiday season? The one that disrupted international flights? The one based on well-hyped “credible” threats and “credible sources” (Official: Credible threats pushed terror alert higher)? The one where Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge said the information suggested “an attack on the United States and the United States' interests — both within the United States and outside — is imminent”?

Well, it turns out that the whole thing was just a big mistake.

All that “chatter” that caused the Bush Keystone Kops to panic was actually just … a fantasy:

senior U.S. officials now tell NBC News that the key piece of information that triggered the holiday alert was a bizarre CIA analysis, which turned out to be all wrong.

CIA analysts mistakenly thought they'd discovered a mother lode of secret al-Qaida messages. They thought they had found secret messages on Al-Jazeera, the Arabic-language television news channel, hidden in the moving text at the bottom of the screen, known as the “crawl,” where news headlines are summarized.

But of course, in fact it was no such thing. And even Ridge himself now admits that it was pretty nutty. (His exact words are “Bizarre, unique, unorthodox, unprecedented.”)

You can't make this stuff up. Not sober, anyway.

PS. Why are we still on “yellow alert”? Not to mention that the whole concept is moronic.

Terror Alert Level

Meanwhile get your parody terror alert systems here

Posted in 9/11 & Aftermath | 1 Comment

Padilla Latest

Padilla latest from Scotusblog :

The Supreme Court may act as early as next Monday on his attempt to get the Justices to review his challenge to his status and his indefinite detention, before the Fourth Circuit can rule.

The petition in 04-1342 seeks direct review of a ruling in February by U.S. District Judge Henry F. Floyd of Spartanburg, S.C., concluding that the President has no authority to designate and detain as an “enemy combatant” a U.S. citizen captured on U.S. soil.

The litigation is also moving along on an expedited schedule in the Fourth Circuit (docket 05-6396), on a regular appeal path by the Justice Department after its loss in Judge Floyd's ruling. The latest development there was the filing on Monday of Padilla's brief.

Posted in 9/11 & Aftermath, Civil Liberties | 2 Comments

Amnesty International Report 2005

From Amnesty International's Report 2005:

The USA continued to hold hundreds of foreign detainees without charge or trial in the US naval base in Guantánamo Bay in Cuba. The refusal of the US authorities to apply the Geneva Conventions to the detainees and to allow detainees access to legal counsel or the courts violated international law and standards and caused serious suffering to detainees and their families. The ruling by the US Supreme Court in June that the US courts have jurisdiction to consider challenges to the lawfulness of such detentions appeared to be a step towards restoring the rule of law for the detainees, but the US administration sought to empty the ruling of any real meaning in order to keep the detainees in legal limbo. The USA also failed to clarify the fate or whereabouts of detainees that it held in secret detention in other countries.

Such serious abuses carried out by a country as powerful as the USA created a dangerous climate. The US administration’s unilateralism and selectivity sent a permissive signal to abusive governments around the world. There is strong evidence that the global security agenda pursued since 11 September 2001, the US-led “war on terror”, and the USA’s selective disregard for international law encouraged and fuelled abuses by governments and others in all regions of the world.

In many countries, new doctrines of security continued to stretch the concept of “war” into areas formerly considered law enforcement, promoting the notion that human rights can be curtailed when it comes to the detention, interrogation and prosecution of “terrorist” suspects.

The “security excuse”, whereby governments curtailed and abused human rights under the cloak of the “war on terror”, was particularly apparent in a number of countries in Asia and Europe. For example, thousands of members of the ethnic Uighur community were arrested in China as “separatists, terrorists and religious extremists”. In Gujarat, India, hundreds of members of the Muslim community continued to be held under the Prevention of Terrorism Act. In Uzbekistan, the authorities rounded up and detained hundreds of people said to be devout Muslims or their relatives, and sentenced many people accused of “terrorism-related” offences to long prison terms following unfair trials. In the USA, there have been reprehensible attempts by officials to argue that torture was not torture, or that the USA bore no responsibility for torture carried out in other countries, even if it had sent the victim there.

Posted in 9/11 & Aftermath | 2 Comments

Call For Papers on “Federal Secrecy After September 11 and the Future of the Information Society”

This sounds interesting — and important.

I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society seeks research papers for a special Fall/Winter, 2005 issue on the theme, “Federal Secrecy After September 11 and the Future of the Information Society.” This issue will be published with the support of The Century Foundation, which has received a grant from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation to promote scholarly inquiry into the impacts of government secrecy. We are open to topics within any discipline, and would be especially receptive to multidisciplinary research in this domain.

Examples of possible topics include:

  • The impacts of secrecy in various domains (e.g., transportation, facility vulnerabilities) on national security
  • The impact of secrecy on public safety preparedness
  • Historical patterns in government secrecy
  • The impacts of the 2001 amendments to the FOIA
  • Government secrecy behavior after September 11 compared to other wars
  • U.S. government secrecy behavior in comparison with other democracies
  • Secrecy before and after the end of the Cold War
  • Is current secrecy policy a consequence of September 11 or an extension of Aministration policies antedating September 11?
  • The impact of government secrecy and scientific research
  • The impact of government secrecy and the impact on innovation
  • The impacts of secrecy on public attitudes
  • The interplay of federal secrecy policy with state and local open government policies

Proposals should offer original work that has not and will not be previously published in another venue. The work should not simply offer the author’s opinion, but shed significant light on the topic presented through the rigorous presentation and analysis of evidence. We envision that completed articles should be roughly 10,000 words each, exclusive of references (but including textual footnotes). Depending on the number of meritorious proposals received and accepted, honoraria in the range of $750.00-$1000.00 will be offered for completed works.

I/S would also be pleased to receive proposals for shorter, less formal essays, of no more than 5,000 words that represent advocacy or more preliminary analysis, although we will be unable to provide honoraria for such works.

Please forward proposals, no more than 1-3 pages in length, to Sol Bermann, Managing Editor of I/S, at bermann.1@osu.edu. The deadline for proposals is WEDNESDAY JUNE 1, 2005. Decisions will be made by June 15, 2005, and the deadline for accepted manuscripts will be August 1, 2005.

I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society is a new interdisciplinary journal of research and commentary concentrating on the intersection of law, policy, and information technology. I/S represents a one-of-a-kind partnership between one of America's leading law schools, the Moritz College of Law at the Ohio State University, and the nation's foremost public policy school focused on information technology, Carnegie Mellon University's H. J. Heinz III School of Law and Public Policy. For additional information about I/S, see www.is-journal.org.

I'm on the I/S editorial board, and will probably submit a paper proposal if I can get the #$# grading done in time, but I'm not an editor of this symposium so I can't take the credit.

Posted in 9/11 & Aftermath, Talks & Conferences | 5 Comments

Ridge Defends that Curious Yellow

Former Homeland Security Czar Tom Ridge Defends Color-Coded Alert System.

Yellow alert forever?

Posted in 9/11 & Aftermath | 3 Comments