Category Archives: Iraq Atrocities

How to vastly increase the odds you have atrocities:

AP, Pentagon Rejected Lawyer As Prison Adviser

By MATT KELLEY, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON – Pentagon officials rejected an Army plan last year to send an experienced military lawyer — who is also a Republican member of Congress — to help oversee the unit blamed for prisoner abuse at the Abu Ghraib complex outside Baghdad.

That left the prison complex, which holds up to 7,000 Iraqis, without an onsite lawyer to guide interrogations and treatment of prisoners.

The top lawyer for the 800th Military Police Brigade, the Army unit in charge of detainees at Abu Ghraib, later came under fire in an Army report about the abuse for being ineffective and “unwilling to accept responsibility for any of his actions.”

The rejected lawyer, Rep. Steve Buyer, R-Ind., and other experts say having had a lawyer at the prison might have prevented or at least mitigated the beatings, sexual humiliation and other abuse detailed in photographs and the Army probe.

“It's always good to have a lawyer around so you've got a conscience for the command and an opportunity to vet questions,” said retired Army Maj. Gen. William L. Nash, who commanded an armored brigade during the 1991 Gulf War (news – web sites).

Pentagon officials confirmed there was no onsite lawyer at Abu Ghraib, but spokesmen for Army Secretary Les Brownlee and Pentagon personnel officials did not respond to repeated requests for comment Friday. Bryan Whitman, a spokesman for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, referred questions to the Army.

Buyer, a strong supporter of the Iraq war and a lieutenant colonel in the Army Reserves, had volunteered to go to Iraq shortly after the invasion in March 2003.

In a telephone interview Friday with The Associated Press, Buyer said military officials all the way up to the Joint Chiefs of Staff had approved his assignment to the 800th Military Police Brigade, which has handled Iraqi prisoners of war since the beginning of the conflict.

Pentagon personnel officials and Brownlee rejected the assignment, saying the Army could fill the requirement another way. Brownlee also wrote to Buyer that his high-profile status could bring danger to the troops around him.

Buyer said he objected to David Chu, the Pentagon's personnel chief, and Charles Abell, Chu's deputy.

“I expressed the importance of having a (lawyer) at the camp,” Buyer said. “You have to ask, when you had a qualified officer, and the civilian leaders, Dr. Chu and the secretary of the Army, said no, who did you send in his place?” …

Buyer served as a lawyer at a prisoner of war camp run by the 800th Brigade during the first Gulf War. His duties, Buyer said, included helping the International Committee of the Red Cross monitor conditions and ensuring guards followed international law such as the Geneva Conventions. He said he also questioned some Iraqis suspected of war crimes.

“The 800th MP Brigade performed exemplary service in the Gulf War,” Buyer said. “There was no hint of any mistreatment or maltreatment of prisoners. It never happened. They had excellent leadership.”

How to keep the lid on:

Electrolite: If we only had a press. Email from a friend with contacts among American troops in Iraq prompts me to wish some journalist would investigate reports that the military has ordered KBR, which provides net connectivity for US camps and bases in Iraq, to cut off all soldiers’ “inessential” access to email and the net for the next 90 days.

I understand that KBR also handles paper mail services to and from serving soldiers in Iraq, and that pickup and delivery are often little better than once a month.

I’d also like someone to investigate what our soldiers actually know about Abu Ghaib, both the events themselves and their political impact in the rest of the world.

If it’s true that the average soldier’s email is being curtailed, and if (as I suspect) many of them have only a patchy knowledge of the scandal and its impact, it would seem that many of our soldiers are about to lose a major lifeline to home without being told why.

Extend it for three months after that, and you are past the election. Which means that MaxSpeak's prophecy…

“The troops will be the peace movement.” As the Iraqi mission disintegrates, the troops will be the first to know, then their families, then everybody.

…just might have hit a speedbump.

It's all too much. Something good (in the partially offsetting sense) could yet come of this, but I don't think the political will exists to make it happen. It is now evident that the administration was on notice about the Iraqi prison abuses for months, and did nothing. It is certain that it at least negligently allowed it to happen in the first place, and appears likely it at least tacitly encouraged it. The reaction in Washington? Wait for the next in order to decide whether to bay-for-the-head-of/fire Rumsfeld.

• Boing Boing, US torturers made screensavers out of atrocity photos
• Making Light, User base persistence
  I have to quote the conclusion:

  And now, a list: The Nine Ways of Being an Accessory to Another’s Sin.

  1. By counsel.
  2. By command.
  3. By consent.
  4. By provocation.
  5. By praise or flattery.
  6. By concealment.
  7. By partaking.
  8. By silence.
  9. By defense of the ill done.

  Anybody feel like keeping score?

• Talking Points Memo, various sorts of abuse are endemic throughout the American prison system
• Risks Digest, Risks of prisoner abuse vs. digital cameras
• The American Street, The Story of Little George
• Approximately Perfect, Meanwhile, in the Alternate Universe … (via Eschaton)
• Better Angels of our Nature, There Is No Honor

And, on a somewhat related note: David Neiwert issues a Media Revolt Manifesto.

Billmon at the Whiskey Bar has been doing a superlative job of collating and explaining the Iraq Atrocities scandal. I urge anyone who breathes to have a look.

For example: in Donald Rumsfeld's Battle With The Truth, Billmon contrasts some of Donald Rumsfeld's statements under oath with the the actual facts.

Why don't I see anything like this in my newspaper?

Here's just one of the many items:

“And when General Taguba came in and made his report, he indicated that a number of the issues that had been raised last year by the ICRC had, in fact, been corrected by the command structure between the time that they were observed by the ICRC and the time that General Taguba's team arrived on the scene.”

Donald Rumsfeld
Testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee
May 7, 2004

On at least one occasion, the 320th MP Battalion at Abu Ghraib held a handful of “ghost detainees” … that they moved around within the facility to hide them from a visiting International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) survey team. This maneuver was deceptive, contrary to Army Doctrine, and in violation of international law.”

Gen. Antonio Taguba
Article 15-6 Investigation of the 800th Military Police Brigade
May 7, 2004

(note: this is the only mention of the ICRC in the Taguba report.)
________________

Jim Henley's Unqualified Offerings:

Daily Reminder to my Fellow Citizens – We torture people. As a matter of policy.

This isn't about news cycles. This is about our self-respect. Leonard Dickens, a year ago:

Torture is the canary in the coal mine. When your society starts seriously talking about torture, it means you've fucked up and become repressive.

The headline may be Bush Apologizes, Calls Abuse 'Stain' on Nation but we Kremlinologists know the real goodies are elsewhere.

First, the top folks in the State department are intensifying their campaign to redeem themselves, even if this means trashing Bush. Powell's interview with GQ came out last week, in which he tired to play loyal to the boss while roughing up his bureaucratic rivals. Then, this week, the increased budget request for Iraq went to Congress without any warning to State, leaving Powell humiliated when he'd just been telling Congress there wouldn't a request for months.

Purely coincidentally, today State lets it be known that only Bush's intransigence and unwillingness to apologize kept him from doing it in the day before yesterday's Arab TV interviews when it still might have done some good. You know that Bush, hates to admit he's wrong. But we, the guys at State who are now worried about our reputations when we have to look for new jobs in January, we want the world to know it's not our fault:

A wide variety of officials in the administration had advised Bush to apologize on Wednesday when he gave interviews to two Arab television channels and were puzzled when he did not, senior U.S. officials said. An apology had been recommended in the talking points Bush received from the State Department and elsewhere, the officials said. Senior administration aides then made a push overnight for him to say he was sorry during his news conference with Abdullah, the officials said.

Talk about burying the good stuff in a news article. But wait, there's more fun stuff in the depths of Mike Allen's article.

Also yesterday, the government's chief classifier decided to open an investigation into the appropriateness of classifying the Army's probe of prison abuses. J. William Leonard, director of the Information Security Oversight Office, agreed to a request in a letter from Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists.

In the letter, Aftergood cited the executive order on classification, No. 12958, as prohibiting the classification of documents solely to “conceal violations of law.” Government documents are supposed to be classified if revealing their contents would harm national security. Senior Pentagon officials have been unable to explain why the report, known as an Article 15-6, was classified. In response to a reporter's question on May 4, Pace said, “I do not know specifically why it was labeled secret.”

At the same news conference, Rumsfeld also was at a loss to explain why the report would be considered secret. “You'd have to ask the classifier,” he said.

Just what is the Information Security Oversight Office? It is adminstratively part of the National Archives — you know the same archives Bush is trying to politicize — although it gets its marching orders (“receive our policy and program guidance”) from the National Security Council (NSC).

Hmm. That would be Condi Rice? Which gives rise to a really evil thought. Suppose the author of the report was the classifier. (Generally, if you have a security clearance and produce a document which relies on secret docs, you have an obligation to make sure the new document is properly classified.) That would be United States Army Major General Antonio M. Taguba, probably not the White House and the NSC's favorite general this week. This wouldn't be an attempt to get him in trouble? Nah. Surely if Eisenhower had someone to hold his underwear when he stepped into it,¹ then Major Generals have someone to do the job of classifying documents for them. Yes, stick with the simple explanation: Rats. Ship. Whole lotta water.

¹ “To leave his mind and his time free, he had others to do the most basic of human chores for him. He did not dress himself – John Moaney, his valet, put on his underwear, socks, shoes, pants, shirt, jacket and tie.” — Stephen E. Ambrose, Eisenhower, p. 299.