Category Archives: Politics: US: 2004 Election

Jon Stewart For Debate Moderator

Works for me: Jon Stewart For Debate Moderator.

Posted in Politics: US: 2004 Election | 4 Comments

MIA: Facts

Things must be bad when even Howard Kurtz notices you are making stuff up:


Missing: 983,000 Tax Pages
: Looks as though President Bush is due for an audit of his tax code facts. “The tax code is a complicated mess,” he said in Bangor, Maine, on Thursday. “You realize, it's a million pages long.” Most Americans probably did not realize it was that long, because it is not. It is, in fact, 17,000 pages long, according to such experts as the conservative Heritage Foundation and Rep. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.).

Update: As the an commentator noted, this was by Dana Milbank, who's about as good as it gets at the Post. I hate to think what these proofs I'm working will look like when they are printed.

Posted in Politics: US: 2004 Election | 3 Comments

Elizabeth Edwards Is Wonderful

One of the reasons I ended up being a John Edwards fan was Elizabeth Edwards. I figured anyone who she would marry had to be OK. Here's more evidence for the proposition that she's great: Elizabeth Edwards reads Daily Kos. She also contributes to the Kerry-Edwards blog.

Posted in Politics: US: 2004 Election | 17 Comments

Who the Terrorists Want to Win, and Why

Even prior to his recent Satanic endorsement, GW Bush picked up plaudits of a sort from the next-most-evil source: active terrorists, in this case the group that is thought to be responsible for the Madrid train bombings:

The statement tells Americans that Abu Hafs al-Masri supports the re-election of President George W. Bush. "We are very keen that Bush does not lose the upcoming elections," it said. Addressing Bush, it said: "We know that a heavyweight operation would destroy your government, and this is what we don't want. We are not going to find a bigger idiot than you."

Source: International Herald Tribune (Mar. 18, 2004). Spotted via Needlenose.

Posted in Politics: US: 2004 Election | 1 Comment

Just Don’t Mention the War

Something else with which to stoke your outrage — how the Bush/RNC slime machine is trying to suggest that anyone who suggests the Boy Emperor's Iraq campaign may be having a wardrobe malfunction is unpatriotic, or maybe even treasonous.

Posted in Politics: US: 2004 Election | 1 Comment

Slime

The New York Times: Republicans Admit Mailing Campaign Literature Saying Liberals Will Ban the Bible.

As Mark A.R. Kleiman says, “If voters fail to become enraged at this sort of slime-mongering, Republicans may be emboldened to repeat it.”

Beware of outrage fatigue. Very very dangerous this time of year.

(On the other hand, there is a cheerful aspect to this. The more desperate and crazy the slime, the better the Democrats must be doing or why would the RNC/Bush crowd bother?)

Posted in Politics: US: 2004 Election | 1 Comment