Category Archives: Politics: US: 2008 Elections

NY Times on Obama’s Security: Clueless or Coy?

The New York Times's Jeff Zeleny has a long article about people worrying about Barack Obama's safety, In Painful Past, Hushed Worry About Obama.

In the past few days, a major Dallas-area paper ran a two inconclusive stories about the level of security at Obama's Dallas rally. These stories were supplemented by a number of blog posts all over the place, many of which include eyewitness accounts of recent Obama rallies elsewhere which also seemed to have a level of security that was at best uneven. Given all that, you might expect that when the Times does a major article on fears for Obama's security, something would be said about what happened in Dallas at the Obama rally.

You would be wrong.

Here's all that the NYT has to say on the subject of Dallas security:

Here in Dallas, those memories were raised in conversation after conversation with several of the 17,000 people who came to see Mr. Obama at a rally last week.

“Right around the corner is the John Kennedy Memorial; everyone all around me was talking about it,” said Imogene Covin, a Democratic activist from Dallas. “In the back of my mind, it’s a possibility that something might happen because he’s something to gawk at right now. But you know why I think he will be safe? He has a broad range of people behind him.”

In fact, as readers of this blog or many others, or of the Dallas-Fort Worth Star-Telegram, know “here in Dallas,” there was a lot more than “memories raised in conversation” — there were allegations by the local cops of bad security judgment. And the Secret Service's response while not totally implausible, hasn't been totally convincing either.

Should we expect better from the Times?

I suppose it's possible the NYT is being coy as a result of a request from the Secret Service not to discuss operational details, but if that were the case you would think that they could tell us so. I can't help but wonder if they just didn't know about the controversy, or if this is another example of an article going into the hopper several days before its printed and being dated by the time it sees daylight.

I've written to Mr. Zeleny to ask, but don't really expect an answer.

Related posts:

Posted in Politics: US: 2008 Elections, The Media | Comments Off on NY Times on Obama’s Security: Clueless or Coy?

Secret Service Says Low Security is All Part of the Plan

Star-Telegram.com: | 02/22/2008 | Secret Service defends security at Obama rally in Dallas: The U.S. Secret Service on Friday defended its handling of security during a massive rally in downtown Dallas for Barack Obama, saying there was no “lapse” in its “comprehensive and layered security plan,” which called for some people to be checked for weapons, while others were not.

Nick Shapiro, a spokesman for Obama in Texas, said the campaign would have no comment on whether there was a security breech in Dallas. Shapiro referred questions to the Secret Service.

“There were no security lapses at that venue,” said Eric Zahren, a spokesman for the Secret Service in Washington. He added there was “no deviation” from the “comprehensive and layered” security plan, implemented in “very close cooperation with our law enforcement partners.”

Zahren rebutted suggestions by several Dallas police officers at the rally who thought the Secret Service ordered a halt to the time-consuming weapons check because long lines were moving slowly, and many seats remained empty as time neared for Obama to appear.

“It was never a part of the plan at this particular venue to have each and every person in the crowd pass through the Magnetometer,” said Zahren, referring to the device used to detect metal in clothing and bags.

Personally, I don’t consider this an adequate explanation. Although I put the original item, Look, We Worry About This Stuff, in my “tinfoil” category, I’m promoting it now to regular politics.

Posted in Politics: US: 2008 Elections | 7 Comments

Gravel Loves Chomsky

Another, far weirder, Gravel video.

Did he really say that Ralph Nader helped Al Gore? And did he really say he'd want Noam Chomsky as one of his closest advisers?

And did he really say he's going to be on the ballot in November (maybe with Nader) on what can only be understood as a third-party ticket?

Noam Chomsky??? As a Presidential adviser? Seriously weird.

On the other hand, as entertainment goes you do approach a Gravel video with the fear that he could do or say anything.

Posted in Politics: US: 2008 Elections | 7 Comments

Viva Obama Video

Living in Miami, how could I resist sharing a video called VIVA OBAMA?

More at amigosdeobama.com.

Posted in Politics: US: 2008 Elections | Comments Off on Viva Obama Video

Clinton Competence Report

A major reason to support Sen. Clinton over Sen. Obama, at least in my book, has been the suggestion that she brings with her a management team tested by time, one much more ready to hit the ground running if they take office.

Competence, as the last seven years — not to mention the Carter administration! — have taught us, is no small thing.

But the Clinton competence aura has taken a big hit in the campaign. First there was the devastating Joshua Green article in the Atlantic, Inside the Clinton Shake-Up.

Now comes this corroborative account of Team Clinton haplessness when it comes to the Texas primaries, Burnt Orange Report::: Senator Clinton Campaign Worried by Texas Primary System.

It does make you wonder.

Posted in Politics: US: 2008 Elections | Comments Off on Clinton Competence Report

YouTubers For Obama

Barow Wow Wow, Go Obama! (Politics of Hope Mix)

There's also a less jolly alternate version they call the “politics as usual mix”; I don't like it as much.

Posted in Politics: US: 2008 Elections | 4 Comments