Category Archives: Politics: US

Marco Rubio “Embellishes Facts”

I guess that’s as close to “lies” as the Washington Post will go about a Republican Senator.

During his rise to political prominence, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) frequently repeated a compelling version of his family’s history that had special resonance in South Florida. He was the “son of exiles,” he told audiences, Cuban Americans forced off their beloved island after “a thug,” Fidel Castro, took power.

But a review of documents — including naturalization papers and other official records — reveals that Rubio’s dramatic account of his family saga embellishes the facts. The documents show that Rubio’s parents came to the United States and were admitted for permanent residence more than 2 1/2 years before Castro’s forces overthrew the Cuban government and took power on New Year’s Day 1959.

via Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show – The Washington Post

(Figured since I had one Marco-Rubio-related post already today, why not two?)

Posted in Florida, Politics: US | Comments Off on Marco Rubio “Embellishes Facts”

Where Have You Gone, FDR?

Fred Clark points to President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Sept. 30, 1934, Fireside Chat:

To those who say that our expenditures for Public Works and other means for recovery are a waste that we cannot afford, I answer that no country, however rich, can afford the waste of its human resources. Demoralization caused by vast unemployment is our greatest extravagance. Morally, it is the greatest menace to our social order. Some people try to tell me that we must make up our minds that for the future we shall permanently have millions of unemployed just as other countries have had them for over a decade. What may be necessary for those countries is not my responsibility to determine. But as for this country, I stand or fall by my refusal to accept as a necessary condition of our future a permanent army of unemployed. On the contrary, we must make it a national principle that we will not tolerate a large army of unemployed and that we will arrange our national economy to end our present unemployment as soon as we can and then to take wise measures against its return. I do not want to think that it is the destiny of any American to remain permanently on relief rolls.

Is it unfair to expect President Obama to be FDR? On the one hand, obviously there’s an element of unfairness in holding him to the standard of one of the best (despite his flaws) Presidents in history. On the other hand, even in politics repeating a success should be easier than inventing it. Heck, the GOP finds repeating Hoover’s failures to be trivially easy.

More generally, is there not something odd and maybe interesting in that the Republican party finds it profitable to wrap itself in the mantle of Reagan while pushing policies opposite to those Reagan actually approved, yet the Democratic party cannot bring itself to call it Hooverism, nor to wrap itself in FDR’s mantle? Are these figures now erased from the popular consciousness? Given the state of our educational system, I suppose anything is possible.

Posted in Econ & Money, Politics: US | 3 Comments

Well That Didn’t Take Long

Team Obama moves from tough talk to partial surrender (then tries to take some of it back).

September 13, 2011 10:35 AM: ‘It’s not an a la carte menu’ — Team Obama says it wants the whole jobs bill passed.

9/13/11 12:41 PM ET Updated: 9/13/11 01:50 PM ET Obama Would Sign Parts Of Jobs Bill, Push For Rest:

The Obama White House is revising its initial unwillingness to negotiate on the president’s job creation plan, saying now that if individual components of the bill came to the president’s desk — as opposed to the bill in its entirety — he would sign them into law.

The new approach opens up the administration to charges that it no longer views the American Jobs Act as a take-it-or-leave-it bill. But in a briefing with reporters Tuesday, senior administration officials insisted President Obama wasn’t backing off his position that he wants the entire bill passed through Congress.

That’s not a ridiculous fallback position, but it is a ridiculous way to undercut your own message in the first few days of the campaign for the bill.

Posted in Politics: US | 2 Comments

Shorter Obama Jobs Speech

“Attention GOP: I’m going to start counting and you better pass my bill of GOP-endorsed tax cuts and popular spending before I get to 10; meanwhile, here’s a preemptive concession on Medicare. And as part of my commitment to transparency, and to ensure that my plan isn’t really all that stimulative to the economy, we’ll ask the Congressional Super-Committee to meet in secret to decide even more cuts to pay for it.”

Posted in Econ & Money, Politics: US | 7 Comments

The Philosopher Knows?

The best argument I have seen for there being a method in what seems to me to be the madness of President Obama’s passivity in the face of his opponents’ political insanity is The Shadow by Robert Paul Wolff, a noted philosopher, long-time (white) professor of Afro-American Studies, and recent and enthusiastic convert to blogging.

Wolff argues eloquently that the Obama strategy is to entice his opponents into ever-greater extremism (as if that took effort?) until they reach the point that they turn off their followers. It is possible that this is a correct reading of the Obama playbook or of his instincts. And while it is possible that this is a good strategy for a community organizer, I still believe it is a crummy way to govern because of all the pain it allows while one waits for the tectonic plates to decide if they want to shift.

I wish I could buy Wolff’s argument, I’d be more cheerful. I don’t, because I think it understates the ability of the Presidency to change the political landscape, both by use of presidential power, and by moving the frame of what is considered first possible than normal. And it creates a false dichotomy in which the only alternative to passivity is anger; in fact the alternative to passivity is boldness.

Obama claims to admire Ronald Reagan. Reagan did not seek bipartisanship as an end in itself, although it’s clear that part of his strategy was geared to northern lunchpail Democrats, and Southern religious mostly-whites. Reagan made a point of looking bold and in doing things that would never command a consensus — like breaking the Air Traffic Control union. Reagan, though, had the advantage of a less disciplined opposition party than the one Obama faces, and this too is a part of Wolff’s argument as to why the Obama patience is a good strategy. It’s not a long essay and it’s worth a read.

As we used to say, and as Wolff seems to be saying, you don’t fight fire with fire — you fight it with water.

Update: I wonder if Wolff was reacting to Ta-Nehisi Coates’s remark (about Rick Perry’s first gaffe as a Presidential candidate) that,

It’s almost as if Obama has this mutant power to compel these guys into charging, full steam, into a wall of spikes.

Posted in Politics: US | 3 Comments

Not Machiavellian Enough

Part of President Obama’s problem is that his opponents do not fear him, and he too often seems to want to be loved. Have we read a single story of President Obama wreaking vengeance on a political enemy? Or even threatening it?
Continue reading

Posted in Politics: US | 6 Comments